IP News Shorts

Here are several stories to start your Monday morning with that I was not able to get to last week because of client commitments and some new business opportunities:

  • The first round of Bilski briefing has been filed  with the Supreme Court.  Click here for links to the various amici briefs at Patently-O, and here for an analysis of Bilski's opening brief at BlawgIT.
     
  • Victoria Pynchon has an important warning for IP litigators about understanding a client's insurance coverage at her IP ADR Blog -- click here to read the story and here to check out Pynchon's husband's new Catastrophic Insurance Coverage Blog.  The blog appears to be a good read, but more importantly IP litigators should make sure that they investigate client's insurance policies early in a case.
     
  • William Patry has a new copyright-related blog, Moral Panics and the Copyright Wars.  It is a companion to his book of the same name, which is excellent.  I had the privilege of receiving an advance copy, which I loved.  I will post a review soon.  For now though, click here for Patry's first post on the new blog.
     
  • Finally, last Friday, as they were headed into the August recess the Senate confirmed David Kappos as the next Director of the PTO -- click here for the PTO's press release.

New Blogs & IP ADR News

A new blog and several stories I have been meaning to get to, but have not had enough time:

  • Tom Patterson, from Chicago, has joined the blogosphere with the Emergency Business Litigation blog, another blog by Lexblog.  It does not have an IP focus, but some of Patterson's first post deal with Federal Circuit decisions regarding injunctions in patent cases -- click here and here to read them.  Welcome to the blogging conversation Tom.
     
  • The IP ADR Blog has an interesting guest post from Robert Rose discussing patent arbitration rules -- click here to read the post.  Of particular interest, Rose points out the oft forgotten statutory obligation to notify the PTO of any arbitration award, which is made part of the file history.
     
  • Also from the IP ADR Blog, Victoria Pynchon has posted the slides that were the basis of a February 2009 CLE presentation we did about alternative dispute resolution in patent disputes, a valuable tool particularly in difficult economic times.  Click here for Pynchon's post with the slides.

Copyright & Trademark News

I have noticed that my news updates tend to be patent-focused, so today  they focus on trademarks and copyrights:

  • IP Law & Business (subscription required to access the article) has an interesting article in the February/March 2009 issue identifying Justice Ginsburg as the Supreme Court's "champion of copyright holders" because of recent opinions supporting broader copyrights.  The article also identifies Justice Breyer, based on dissents in the same cases, as leading the cause for narrower copyrights.  And the article predicts that the Supreme Court is trending toward a narrower view of copyrights.
     
  • Seattle Trademark Lawyer Michael Atkins has a timely post (click here to read it) that traces the March Madness trademark back to the Illinois high school basketball playoffs, as early as the 1940s.  The NCAA and the Illinois High School Association have since pooled their rights and both have a license to use the marks. 
     
  • Victoria Pynchon has a great series of posts looking at laches in trademark law based upon a recent Ninth Circuit decision -- click here and here.

 

IP News: ADR & Copyright Damages

Here are several items from around the web that are worth your attention:

  • The latest edition of Doug Lichtman's IP Colloquium is available here and it is another excellent listen.  The program looks at copyright's statutory damages regime through the lens of music downloading.  Lichtman moderates an impressive group of experts and stakeholders in the debate.  It would be worth the time, even if CLE credit was not available, but it is.
     
  • Congratulations to Victoria Pynchon of the IP ADR Blog and Settle It Now on her move to ADR Services -- click here to read Pynchon's post about the move.
     
  • The Alternative Patent Dispute Resolution Project at San Diego's Thomas Jefferson School of Law has an interesting survey up about how ADR should be used in patent cases.  No results yet, but I will discuss them here when they are made available.  The survey follows up a survey done ten years ago by IPWatchdog's Gene Quinn.  Click here to take the survey.

 

Most Read Patent Blogs

IPWatchdog Gene Quinn recently published his list of the top 26 patent blogs, based upon Technorati rankings (Quinn only considered blogs in the top 1M of the Technorati rankings) -- click here to read Quinn's post.  Quinn manually determined which blogs counted as patent blogs, and did nice work.  Although I would add the IP ADR Blog to the list.  While I do not place much weight in blog rangings, the list identified a few new blogs that I plan to follow, and it is gratifying to see that the Chicago IP Litigation Blog has a strong reader base in the patent world.

Here are Quinn's rankings:

  1. Patently-O - Technorati Rank 21,202
  2. Patent Baristas - Technorati Rank 61,134
  3. IPWatchdog - Technorati Rank 80,245
  4. Against Monopoly - Technorati Rank 80,245
  5. Patently Silly - Technorati Rank 90,082
  6. Chicago IP Litigation Blog - Technorati Rank 117,073
  7. PHOSITA - Technorati Rank 101,726
  8. Spicy IP - Technorati Rank 129,347
  9. PLI Patent Practice Center - Technorati Rank 132,753
  10. Duncan Bucknell Company’s IP Think Tank - Technorati Rank 136,348
  11. Patent Prospector - Technorati  Rank 152,448
  12. Securing Innovation - Technorati Rank 162,007
  13. Peter Zura’s 271 Patent Blog - Technorati Rank 163,794
  14. The Invent Blog- Technorati Rank 167,214
  15. Promote the Progress - Technorati Rank 198,166
  16. I/P Updates- Technorati Rank 213,371
  17. IP NewsFlash- Technorati Rank 221,777
  18. Orange Book Blog - Technorati Rank 221,777
  19. The IP Factor - Technorati Rank 250,588
  20. Philip Brook’s Patent Infringement Updates- Technorati Rank 273,434
  21. Patent Docs - Technorati Rank 300,413
  22. Antiticpate This! - Technorati Rank 351,677
  23. Patent Fools (now operated by IPWatchdog.com) - Technorati Rank 351,092
  24. Patentably Defined - Technorati Rank 614,978
  25. Steve van Dulke’s Patent Blog -  Technorati Rank 676,101
  26. IP Spotlight - Technorati Rank 752,199

Continuing Legal Education: Alternative Dispute Resolution in Intellectual Property Cases

Along with the IP ADR Blog's Victoria Pynchon, I am giving an ALI-ABA continuing legal education teleconference discussing alternative dispute resolution as a low-cost alternative for intellectual property disputes -- click here to register.  The program is at 12 pm CT on this Wednesday, February 18.  Here are ALI-ABA's program highlights:

Why Attend?

 

In a difficult economy, intellectual property protection and assertion is more important than ever. The combined stressors of a poor fiscal climate and shrinking legal budgets place a significant strain on any business dependent upon IP assets. as companies face difficult economic decisions, it is increasingly difficult to fit the expense and extended uncertainty of copyright, patent and trademark litigation into a forward looking business plan. This one-hour seminar explores the use of alternative dispute resolution as a means of protecting intellectual property and business activity, while minimizing the expense and devotion of time related to traditional IP litigation.

 

What You Will Learn

 

This program examines how to move an IP dispute toward alternative dispute resolution; best practices for controlling the expense and length of the process; and best practices for successful alternative dispute resolution. Whether you are an experienced IP practitioner or simply one grappling with IP issues in your general commercial practice, knowing how to offer your clients a wide array of ADR options might make the difference between a practice that survives and one that thrives. The seminar will cover the following topics:

  • How to choose between litigation and ADR.
  • The most successful strategies for guiding your dispute into the best ADR forum at the most productive time. 
  • The five basic rules of “distributive” or “fixed sum” bargaining that will give you the “edge” in all future settlement negotiations. 
  • The five ways to “expand the fixed sum pie” by exploring and exploiting the client interests underlying your own and your opponents’ legal positions. 
  • The Ten Mediation/Settlement Conference Traps for the Unwary.  

Invest just 60 minutes at your home or office to learn about alternative dispute resolution in the IP field from this duo of experts. This audio program comes to you live on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 12:00-1:00 pm CST, via your phone or your computer. Materials corresponding to the course may be downloaded or viewed online.


Planning Chair

 

R. David Donoghue, Esquire, Holland & Knight LLP, Chicago, IL

 

Faculty

 

Victoria Pynchon, Esquire, Settle It Now Dispute Resolution Services, Beverly Hills, CA 

Continuing Legal Education: IP Alternative Dispute Resolution

Along with the IP ADR Blog's Victoria Pynchon, I am giving an ALI-ABA continuing legal education teleconference discussing alternative dispute resolution as a low-cost alternative for intellectual property disputes -- click here to register.  The program is at 11 am CT on February 18.  Here are ALI-ABA's program highlights:
Why Attend?

In a difficult economy, intellectual property protection and assertion is more important than ever. The combined stressors of a poor fiscal climate and shrinking legal budgets place a significant strain on any business dependent upon IP assets. as companies face difficult economic decisions, it is increasingly difficult to fit the expense and extended uncertainty of copyright, patent and trademark litigation into a forward looking business plan. This one-hour seminar explores the use of alternative dispute resolution as a means of protecting intellectual property and business activity, while minimizing the expense and devotion of time related to traditional IP litigation.

What You Will Learn

This program examines how to move an IP dispute toward alternative dispute resolution; best practices for controlling the expense and length of the process; and best practices for successful alternative dispute resolution. Whether you are an experienced IP practitioner or simply one grappling with IP issues in your general commercial practice, knowing how to offer your clients a wide array of ADR options might make the difference between a practice that survives and one that thrives. The seminar will cover the following topics:

  • How to choose between litigation and ADR.
     
  • The most successful strategies for guiding your dispute into the best ADR forum at the most productive time.
     
  • The five basic rules of “distributive” or “fixed sum” bargaining that will give you the “edge” in all future settlement negotiations.
     
  • The five ways to “expand the fixed sum pie” by exploring and exploiting the client interests underlying your own and your opponents’ legal positions.
     
  • The Ten Mediation/Settlement Conference Traps for the Unwary.
     

Invest just 60 minutes at your home or office to learn about alternative dispute resolution in the IP field from this duo of experts. This audio program comes to you live on Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 12:00-1:00 pm CST, via your phone or your computer. Materials corresponding to the course may be downloaded or viewed online.

Planning Chair

R. David Donoghue, Esquire, Holland & Knight LLP, Chicago, IL

Faculty

Victoria Pynchon, Esquire, Settle It Now Dispute Resolution Services, Beverly Hills, CA

 

Creating Order in Complex Litigation

Litigators universally struggle to enforce order over complex cases, and patent cases are some of the most difficult.  They often include multiple patents, numerous accused products, inventors, experts and often various contracts.  Generating systems for both capturing and organizing facts and issues is critical, but difficult.  And once you organize it for yourself, you need to find a way to organize it for the Court and then the jury, an even more difficult task.

I have generally used notebooks including marked up copies of the patents, key prior art, any contracts , accused product information and other hot documents.  Others use computer programs or even whiteboards.  But the Settlement Perspectives Blog (via Vickie Pynchon at the IP ADR Blog) has converted me to mind mapping -- click here for the Settlement Perspectives post and here for the IP ADR Blog post.  Mind maps allow you to graphically depict all of the critical facts and issues in your case, how they interconnect and to hyperlink to the relevant documents or testimony.  And the best part is that you can burn your mind map onto a DVD and offer it to the judge as an aid for resolving summary judgment motions or construing claims.  This one graphic depiction of your case with hyperlinks to the evidence could be more powerful than a twenty-five page brief explaining your arguments in detail.  Mind maps are excellent tools for creating order from the disorderly facts of a litigation. 

Here is an example of what a mind map can look like:

IP Legal News

Here are several blog posts that are worth your time on this Monday morning:

  • At Deliberations, Anne Reed warns of six mistakes that can derail voir dire -- click here to read the post.  Anyone who follows Deliberations knows that when Reed discusses voir dire, everyone should listen.
     
  • The Federal Circuit heard oral argument in Tafas v. Dudas last week.  Here is some of the commentary:  Patent Baristas; Patently-O; & PLI Blog.
     
  • At IP ADR Blog, Victoria Pynchon offers to arbitrate your patent case and says under expedited AAA commercial rules you can get a decision within 45 days of selecting the arbitrator -- click here to read the post.  Amazing, I may try that in the dispute resolution clause of my next license agreement.
     
  • Anyone who read his 2007 NYC Marathon Blawg Review will not be surprised that Eric Turkewitz's post-Thanksgiving Blawg Review last week at his New York Personal Injury Law Blog was one of the best of the year -- click here to read it.

 

Blawg Review #181 -- ADR & Canadian Thanksgiving

Diane Levin hosted this week's Blawg Review #181 at Mediation Channel -- click here to read it.  As you would expect from one of Ed.'s Blawg Review Sherpas, the Review is both well-written and exhaustive.  Levin's focus was International Conflict Resolution Day.  And when Ed. realized that he had created an international incident by not acknowledging Canadian Thanksgiving, Levin even updated the Review with some Canadian content.  By the way, happy Thanksgiving to the Blog's Canadian friends and readers.

Among other posts, Levin highlighted the October Carnival of Trust, hosted by its founder Charles Green at Trust Matters -- click here to read it.  Green links to a post at Without Wax about what to do when your trust in someone begins slipping away -- click here to read it.  The blog, and the post, appear to be focused more on family and friend relationships.  But the issue and the proposed resolution translate to the legal realm because trust is paramount in the law just as it is with family and friends -- with courts, with opposing counsel, with clients and with colleagues.  Without Wax suggests that instead of pulling back when trust is disappearing, you engage that person and the problem.  Silence rarely fixes trust.  You are far better off facing the issue and trying to fix the problem so that it does not recur, whether it is a misunderstanding or an actual breach of trust.

Finally, Larry Lessig's enthralling Wall Street Journal op-ed piece about the current state of copyright law and whether it fits with modern life did not make the Review (probably because it was not a blog post), but it is worth a read -- click here for Lessig's op-ed.  Or you could skip right to Victoria Pynchon's excellent analysis at the IP ADR Blog -- click here to read Pynchon's post.

[UPDATE]:  Lessig makes clear at his Lessig 2.0 blog that despite the title the WSJ gave his op-ed -- A Defense of Piracy -- he does not support piracy.  Lessig is proposing conforming copyright law to what he sees as the realities of modern living.

Making Joint Defense Agreements Work

Joint defense agreements are an increasingly common part of big patent litigaitons, in the Northern District and across the country.  Having been involved in numerous joint defense groups, my colleague Thomas Pasternak and I wrote an article that was published in the most recent edition of the ABA's Litigation magazine about best practices for joint defense groups and dealing with joint defense agreements -- click here to for a pdf of the article, with permission from the ABA of course.

Probably the most important tip is one I have discussed before -- communication, including live meeetings, is critical to building and maintaining relationships among the joint defense group:

The number of members of the [joint defense group] will have some bearing on how it is organized and managed, but regardless, communication is the key. Weekly, short conference calls once the case is running hot are important, however painful that is, to keep everyone looped in. For important strategy decisions, live meetings are going to be necessary. At the same time, try to put as few communications between co-defendants in writing as possible. Discovery of those communications can and does happen, despite all best legal efforts to prevent it, and you will be particularly embarrassed if you disparage opposing counsel or the judge in venting in an e-mail to your codefendant and that e-mail ends up being produced.

Click here for my previous discussion of the importance of live meetings for building relationships during litigations and click here for Victoria Pynchon's IP ADR blog post that sparked my comments.

Blawg Review & the September Carnival of Trust

Blawg Review #175 is up at Jamie Spencer's Austin DWI Lawyer (another LexBlog site) -- click here to read the Review.  Fitting with Ed.'s sense of humor, a DWI lawyer was chosen to host the Labor Day Review, instead of a more traditional pick, like a labor lawyer.  Of course, there are lots of interesting DWI posts, and a few good IP links.  Spencer links to Victoria Pynchon's post at the IP ADR Blog about the arrest of a blogger who posted new Guns N' Roses tracks before the group released its new album -- click here to read it.  In a "teeny tiny" act of civil disobedience, Pynchon posted the entire text of the LA Times story on the arrest.  While I will admit to one or two acts of civil disobedience in my day, today you are just getting a link to the Chicago Tribune's story by Michelle Quinn and Swati Pandey on the arrest and the increasing use of criminal copyright infringement prosecutions -- click here.

September's Carnival of Trust is up at Compensation Force -- click here for the Carnival.  There are no specific legal or IP posts this month, but lots of great stuff on building and maintaining relationships with trust.

Blawg Review #173

Last week’s Olympic edition Blawg Review focused on the medals. Building on that, this week I discuss the elements of a world record swim. If you were watching last week, instead of blogging, you saw 20 of them in the Olympic pool; seven by Mr. Phelps.

 

Practice

Nothing is more critical than preparation. A big part of preparation is tightening your stroke and cutting out unnecessary motion. Reese Morrison, at the Law Department Management blog, discusses blunt suggestions for trimming legal bills.

 

Endless hours in the pool alone are not enough, you need a good coach. Business development coach Cordell Parvin provides an excellent three part series at his Law Consulting Blogone, two, and three – on persistence, an important element of any Olympic training program. In an Olympic caliber display of persistence, Drug & Device Law had an exhaustive post discussing and classifying each medical device preemption case since the landmark Supreme Court decision in Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc., 128 S. Ct. 999 (2008).

 

You also need a support network to help you get through all of the pool time. Bruce Allen, at Marketing Catalyst, teaches us how to avoid the cocktail conversation you cannot escape from at a networking event. At Copyblogger, John Morrow explains that content is no longer king in the blogosphere, you need friends. And he teaches you how to get them. At BlawgIT, Brett Trout – who is a fighter, not a swimmer – has an interesting post about how to work together as a community to thwart webjackings (the hijacking of a website). And Mediation Channel’s Diane Levin discusses the social side of blogging, and reading blogs.

 

Of course, if you do not have time to practice you will never set the record. So, you need a job, or at least some cash. On that note, Harmful Error posts the great news that loan forgiveness programs were expanded this week for legal aid lawyers, state prosecutors and public defenders. 

 

The Suit

The clothes make the man (or the woman). This year the go-to duds were Speedo’s LZR suits. Patent Librarian Michael White tells us that, no surprise, Speedo patented the LZRIPKat expands on swimming patents, providing a broader view of Olympics-related patents.

 

Genes


As a guy who swam for a lot of years and practiced hard throughout, I can tell you not everyone has what it takes to set world records. The closest I came was getting beat by an Olympian and world record holder. Of course, you might be less impressed by my loss if you knew that at the time his Olympic medals were four or five decades old, and I was 19. At Idealawg, Stephanie West Allen discusses the traits that make entrepreneurs entrepreneurial.

                                                                     Mental Focus

One of the big stories on Phelps this week was how he thinks of nothing but not losing during a race. At Litigation & Trial, Maxwell Kennerly tells us that you have to know when you are sweating the details more than your client would want by over emphasizing proof-reading. Of course, even Kennerly agrees that some details matter. 

                                                                  Knowing the Rules 

You have to know the rules. Turn wrong or break the rules for your stroke and beating a record by ten seconds will not matter. At the Legal Juice, John Mesirow reports that kids at the Lake County Florida library are allowed to rent R-rated movies because they believe it is an unconstitutional delegation of authority for the Motion Picture Association of America’s guidelines for determining obscenity. I am sure kids from all over that area are flocking to the Lake County library because the rules are on their side, at least for now.

 

Filewrapper reports on a Federal Circuit decision holding that copyright infringement, and not just breach of contract, when the terms of an open source license governing the copyrighted material are breached. For more on this major decision in the IP world, check out: BLT; Law Pundit; and Patently-O.

 

Seattle Trademark Lawyer Mike Graham shows the consequences of not following the rules using two Western District of Washington opinions.

 

Ethan Lieb, guest blogging at Freakonomics, argues that we need to change the rules requiring unanimous juries. And the WSJ Law Blog discusses a judge and a juror who clashed over jury nullification.

The Start


A bad start is hard to recover from, especially when you are chasing the fastest time ever. Evan Schaeffer shows how to open well at trial at the Illinois Trial Practice Weblog, and he links to Trial Theatre’s opening statement quiz.

Turns

Coming off the wall in a turn is the fastest a swimmer goes during a race. So, you need good turns. IntLawGrrls discuss how to turn around the conflict between Georgia and Russia (sorry the turns section was tough).

 

Legal Literacy discusses Whole Foods’ turned around (or recalled) beef and looks behind the scenes at how it happened and Whole Foods’ impressively quick response.

 

The Finish


Do you do an extra stroke or do you glide in hard? Always a tough question, but the .01 seconds the decision costs you can mean the race and the record.

At his E.D. Texas Weblog, Michael Smith reports that while the E.D. Texas started out as a rocket docket, particularly for patents, it has now slowed down and let many other districts catch it with a time to trial of 24 – 30 months.

 

The Law and Magic Blog reminds us that we cannot always win, and that trying to rig the system to guarantee wins – he is talking about the stock market, but it holds true for the pool – is dangerous work.

 

At the IP ADR Blog, Victoria Pynchon praises several Perkins Coie attorneys who went the distance for their pro bono clients at Gitmo and earned the clients’ respect for providing them an able defense.

 

** Images provided via a Creative Commons license by A. Dawson or Andre from Flicker. **

 

Next week's Blawg Review will be at fellow LexBlog site, the Texas Appellate Law Blog.

 

Blawg Review has information about next week's host, and instructions on how to get your blawg posts reviewed in upcoming issues.

 

 

Blawg Review #171 -- Setting, Then Meeting Expectations

For my rookie Blawg Review, I kept my head down, worked hard and hoped to meet the Review's high standards set by the reviewers before me.  Victoria Pynchon at the IP ADR Blog, took a different route.  She guaranteed victory, promising "one of the best [Blawg Review]'s ever."  And she was right.  She used a risque theme and a massive number of links to deliver an excellent review -- click here to read it.  My only complaint, I cannot possibly get through all of her linked posts.

I am hosting the Blawg Review in two weeks, and Pynchon has set the bar high.  Make sure to be here in two weeks to watch me clear it.

Blawg Review #170 -- Equal Protection & Due Process

Blawg Review # 170 is up (actually it went up yesterday,* a day early) at Simple Justice, a New York blog with a criminal defense focus -- click here for the Review.  This week's theme is the due process and equal protection rights granted by the Fourteenth Amendment.  As the son of a criminal defense attorney, I have a soft spot for the due process clause.  And Simple Justice does not disappoint, providing a varied look at last week's legal blog posts.

Blawg Review returns here in three weeks, after visiting the IP ADR Blog and the Ohio Employer's Law blog over the next two weeks.

*  Who says Blawg Review does not get any link love?  Actually, Ed. does, but I cannot imagine it is true.

A Call for Face-to-Face Communication in Litigation

Victoria Pynchon posted an article she wrote (not sure where it was published) at her IP ADR Blog -- click here for the post and the article.  Pynchon argued that the common practice of communicating with opposing counsel largely by email, except during depositions or hearings, tends to increase animosity and conflict of a litigation.  In the asocial world of email we tend to write more aggressively and we tend to read more aggression into emails we receive.  Pynchon supports these theories with studies, but I suspect most litigators are aware of the email aggression problem from practice. 
It is no surprise that increased aggression in a naturally aggressive proceeding has negative consequences.  For example, parties that often meet for the first time at a mediation or settlement conference arrive not trusting or respecting each other, making resolution much more difficult.  Pynchon suggested a somewhat radical solution to the email problem -- live meetings with opposing counsel.  She suggested that you routinely have live meetings with opposing counsel throughout the course of a litigation, including perhaps even doing some meetings over a meal.  The face-to-face contact would generate the trust and respect needed to resolve issues that always arise during  a litigation.  I have always advocated live meetings with co-counsel in a multi-party litigation.  Email communications (or even conference calls) tend to get out of hand and the parties tend not to pay enough attention to others' positions.  I am going to expand that practice to opposing counsel.

One other thought, that I do not know if Pynchon will agree with.  Those who still avoid email and continue using letters as a main communication means are not off the hook.  I started practicing when letters, not emails, were how you communicated with opposing counsel.  Those letters tended to be far more aggressive than the attorneys were in a live conversation.  And I suspect people tended to read extra aggression into the letters they received.  I do not know if aggression is stronger in emails than letters, but the same problem exists whether you hit send, hit print or use a pen to write to opposing counsel.

Blawg Review #133

Last week the intellectual property world obsessed over injunctions – specifically, a preliminary injunction hearing in the Eastern District of Virginia resulting in an injunction against the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office’s (“PTO”) new continuation rules. There was a lot of analysis about the injunction, including live blogging by Patent Practice Center Patent Blog and a lot of post-injunction analysis by, among others: 271 Patent Blog; FileWrapper; Patent Baristas; Patent Docs (and here); Patent Prospector; PHOSITA; Patently-O; WSJ Law Blog; and Washington State Patent Law Blog. For those of you who have no idea what a continuation is or just do not care about the particulars of the rules, I promise that I am done with patent continuations for this post. Honestly, I find the rules rather tedious myself. I prefer to focus on litigating patents, rather than the PTO’s prosecution rules. So, today we talk about injunctions:

According to TechCrunch, Patent Monkey received a permanent injunction when it was sold to the Internet Real Estate Group. But Patent Monkey’s patent search technology will see its injunction lifted when it is used on www.patents.com. Hopefully, for those like me who enjoyed it, Patent Monkey’s Infinite Monkey Theorem Blog will also see its injunction lifted.

Virtually Blind has an interesting report on Second Life’s* new Patent & Trademark Office, the SLPTO. No word on whether the SLPTO and the Second Life legal system generally will allow for any permanent injunctions. Right now it appears that the SLPTO will be heavily skewed toward copyright and trademark, which makes sense in a virtual world. And before we learn whether the SLPTO has any enforcement mechanisms, Blawg IT is offering to represent virtual clients before the SLPTO. I would get a retainer up front Brett – virtual clients can be difficult to track down when the bills are due.

The Patry Copyright Blog shows why Second Life injunctions may be necessary. Six Second Life players have sued a Queens man in the Eastern District of New York for trademark and copyright infringement based upon sales of goods in Second Life. I wonder if the trademarks and copyrights were registered with the SLPTO or the US PTO/Copyright Office. And does the E.D.N.Y. have authority to issue cyber-injunctions?

Promote the Progress provides an interesting piece on the long-term effects of last week’s injunction against the PTO on shaping patent reform.

SportsBiz explains that plaintiffs who were bilked out of millions in attorneys’ fees by their now-jailed lawyers were not irreparably harmed. A Kentucky court awarded them a 20% ownership interest in Curlin, the prize race horse and Breeder’s Cup Classic winner partially owned by the jailed lawyers.

Adams Drafting issues its own injunction against using virgules. Using what? The virgule, or the forward slash. He explains that it is frequently used to mean: 1) “per” – 50 miles/hour; 2) “or” – and/or; and 3) “and” – all parents/subsidiaries/affiliates are bound by the obligations. The problem is that the various uses create ambiguity. Adams acknowledges that he cannot find any litigation specifically about the virgule. But the best solution is to remove the virgule from your writing before you become embroiled in the first litigation over one. And when it comes to rules of writing and grammar, the best solution is to listen to Adams.

What if you do not want an injunction or just want a faster, cheaper resolution? The IP ADR blog is talking about last week’s big settlement between Vonage and Verizon. They suggest that you consider using contingent agreements to control for changing future conditions and charitable contributions. They also point out that creativity and out-of-the-box thinking are important elements for reaching settlements.

Another way to avoid an injunction is to understand how best to argue against the opposing party and their counsel. The Center for Internet & Society discusses how men and women in the United States and in other cultures communicate and suggests that understanding the nuances of how different people communicate around the globe could advance legal discourse.

Lowering the Bar reports on a Michigan man sentenced to sixty days in jail for a home invasion that ended in him throwing two large pickles at residents of the home. No word on whether he will be enjoined from pickle ownership. Okay, that is a weak tie-in, but who can resist a pickle invasion story.

Deliberations discusses one of the basic truths of trial law – you must connect with your jury about basic truths of your case. That is equally true when seeking an injunction – if the judge senses something is not right about your argument, you will not get your injunction.

The writers’ strike that is expected this week is not an injunction, but it will mean an end to new scripted television and movies. Concurring Opinions has an interesting post about a brewing legal dispute between the studios and the writers’ union, the Writers Guild of America (“WGA”). The WGA is requiring that members provide information on all unproduced projects and an update on the status of those projects, as per the labor agreement between the WGA and the studios. But the studios, based upon their individual agreements with writers, are warning writers that the studios  own the scripts and the writers are barred by contract from giving the WGA any information about the projects. These conflicting contracts place the writers in quite a pickle (I could not resist), and it poses an interesting legal question as to which contract controls.

And I end with a post that is actually about an injunction. The Maryland IP Law Blog (another LexBlog creation) posted about a District of Delaware court that upheld a jury verdict of patent infringement and plans to enter a permanent injunction against Lonza, Ltd., Nutrinova Inc. and Nutrinova Nutrition Specialties & Food Ingredients GmbH prohibiting the U.S. sale and use of a fatty acid product currently marketed under the brand name Lonza DHA for use in functional foods and dietary supplements.

Thanks for reading. And for the Blog’s regular readers, I will be back to my usual Northern District of Illinois focus tomorrow.

* Second Life is an internet-based virtual world where “residents” interact through avatars. For example, the Seventh Circuit’s Judge Posner appeared in Second Life with an avatar closely resembling him to answer questions from, among others, a DC IP lawyer using an avatar of a humanized raccoon. Check out the New World Notes blog for a transcript and some screenshots.