N.D. Illinois: 2009 Intellectual Property Filings

The Northern District of Illinois continued its historically busy intellectual property docket in 2009.  For the first time in several years, there was a slight decrease in patent case filings. Of course, that is not surprising in light of a difficult economy and patent filings being down across the country. And I suspect that the new Local Patent Rules* will result in an increase in patent litigation filings for 2010. Trademark cases bucked their downward trend over the last several years, and were up by about 10% over 2008. Finally, copyright cases continued a relatively steep decline.  But despite the decline, the Northern District maintains one of the most active copyright dockets in the country.  This chart shows the number of yearly patent, trademark and copyright cases filed in the Northern District during calendar years 2006 through 2009 (data gathered from the Stanford IP Clearinghouse and Pacer):
 

Northern District IP Case Filings

Case Type

2006

2007

2008

2009

Patent

126

141

151

137

Trademark

136

130

128

136

Copyright

194

123

81

41

Click here for much more on the Local Patent Rules in the Blog's archives.

Chicago IP Colloquium: Litigating High-Tech Patents

The next installment of the Spring 2009 Chicago Intellectual Property Colloquium is this Tuesday, February 10, at 4:00 pm in Room 1103 at Loyola University Chicago Law School.*  This installment of the Colloquium will be especially interesting to the Blog's readers, as the paper to be presented is directly focused on patent litigation.  Professor Colleen Chien of Santa Clara University Law School will present her paper:  Narratives and Evidence in the Litigation of High-Tech Patents.  The event will be held at Loyola University Chicago School of Law, 25 East Pearson Street, on Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 4:00 p.m. in Room 1103.  Chien's paper uses data from the Stanford IP Litigation Clearinghouse.

*  The Colloquium is jointly sponsored by Chicago-Kent and Loyola University Chicago.

Legal News

Here is some IP-related news for your weekend enjoyment:

  • Seattle Trademark Lawyer Mike Graham warns that the excellent Stanford IP Clearinghouse may not be counting all cases in its data based on Graham's comparison of 2008 trademark filings in the Western District of Washington using PACER and the Stanford IP Clearinghouse -- click here to read the post.  I echo Graham's statement that even if there are discrepancies, or even missing data, the Stanford IP Clearinghouse is an excellent resource with vast potential.
     
  • Blawg Review #196 was hosted on Australia Day this week by Peter Black's Freedom to Differ, an Australian blog focused on internet regulation -- click here to read the Review.    After tackling controversy surrounding the date of Australia day, Black discusses several IP issues including Duncan Bucknell's post regarding YouTube copyright issues; and Brendan Scott's series on closed source software.