Black & Decker v. Robert Bosch Tool Corp., No. 04 C 7955, 2006 WL 3883921 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 20, 2006) (St. Eve, J.).
Judge St. Eve’s latest opinion in this patent dispute awarded plaintiff its costs pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 54(d) over defendant’s objection that plaintiff’s alleged misconduct. My analysis of Judge St. Eve’s opinion which analyzed defendant’s misconduct allegations, as well as opinions addressing numerous other aspects of this case and the resulting trial, can be found in the Blog’s archives. In response to defendant’s allegations of misconduct, the Court cited her previous opinion finding that there was no misconduct and noted that counsel for both parties "exhibited rigorous advocacy on behalf of their clients." The remainder of the opinion determined which requested fees were appropriate. It serves as an excellent primer on what fees will be paid in the Northern District and what acceptable charges are for those fees.