Civix-DDI, LLC v. National Assoc. of Realtors, No. 05 C 6869, 2007 WL 178318 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 22, 2007) (St. Eve, J.).

Judge St. Eve granted defendant summary judgment that certain of its alleged activities are protected by plaintiff Civix’s covenant-not-to-sue with covenant-provider MapQuest and denied summary judgment as to activities that might be covered by Civix’s similar covenant-not-to-sue with content-provider Navteq.  Another opinion on a similar issue with defendant Yahoo in the case is discussed in this post.  The Court held that both covenants prevented suits against the licensee’s customers or end users with respect to or relating to the licensee’s technology.  But in the case of the Navteq agreement, there was an issue of fact as to whether a third party in the stream of commerce between Navteq and added independent value to thereby giving more than the Navteq technology and kept from benefiting from the covenant-not-to-sue.  In the case of the MapQuest technology, there was no such third party in the stream of commerce and, therefore, no question that was protected by MapQuest’s covenant-not-to-sue.