Last Wednesday the Chicago IP Alliance held its second annual Chicago IP Day at Loyola. It was, no surprise, an excellent program providing an information-packed day. I do not have the time to summarize all of the presentations, but I will give some highlights. George McAndrews, McAndrews, Held & Malloy, gave a very interesting presentation outlining his views on the Supreme Court’s recent eBay v. MercExchange opinion requiring the use of the standard permanent injunction test to determine whether a permanent injunction should be granted after a patent infringement judgment. Essentially, he argued that the Supreme Court’s ruling contradicts the constitutional grant of a limited monopoly. His presentation led to some spirited debate at various tables during the excellent lunch in Loyola’s beautiful new conference room atop the law school.Continue Reading Chicago IP Day
Supreme Court
More Commentary on KSR v. Teleflex
I do not want the Blog to get off track, so this will be my last post for awhile on the subject, but here is a roundup of blogs discussing yesterday’s argument:
Chicago’s own 271 Patent Blog
I will be back at the Blog’s traditional subjects tomorrow with Northern District
Extra, Extra Read More About It: Chicago Daily Law Bulletin on the KSR Argument
Following up on my post yesterday, The Chicago Daily Law Bulletin has published this story regarding today’s Supreme Court argument in KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. The argument centered around whether the Federal Circuit’s obviousness test should be revised (more on the KSR case from Patently-O here and here). Of course, Justices often play devil’s advocate in oral arguments, so it is dangerous to presume outcomes based upon oral argument, but it looks like it was good legal theater. Continue Reading Extra, Extra Read More About It: Chicago Daily Law Bulletin on the KSR Argument
Extra, Extra, Read All About It: Patent Law Is Being Shaped By The Supreme Court
Although it is not about the Northern District, there is a great article on the front page of today’s Wall Street Journal about the Supreme Court’s increasing interest in patent law. The article is here (subscription required) or you can read about it on the Journal’s Law Blog here. The Journal’s Law Blog also…

